<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Thomas Power</title>
	<atom:link href="http://thomaspower.org/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://thomaspower.org</link>
	<description>Internet scout, speaker, IP creation</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:40:19 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>SoLoMo: the new frontier</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/solomo-the-new-frontier/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/solomo-the-new-frontier/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 08:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=174434</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Cloud is a nice idea but it doesn't work because each Cloud owner seeks control. Control has left us. Control belongs in the past.

Using iPad, iTunes, Gmail, BlackBerry and Amazon MP3s on my BlackBerry is a nightmare. 
Contact management. Nightmare...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Cloud is a nice idea but it doesn't work because each Cloud owner seeks control. Control has left us. Control belongs in the past.<br />
<br />
Using iPad, iTunes, Gmail, BlackBerry and Amazon MP3s on my BlackBerry is a nightmare. <br />
Contact management. Nightmare. Email management. Nightmare. Syncing a nightmare.<br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/lAWQcUUIQAo" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
So whoever wins SoLoMo wins Cloud. One winner who will it be?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/solomo-the-new-frontier/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>#ORS 120 complete 80 to go (updated)</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ors-120-complete-80-to-go-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ors-120-complete-80-to-go-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 12:37:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=174321</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[William Buist (ORC) and James Murphy (OSC) now have 120 completed #ORS questionnaires.

We must have 200 to validate all the questions.

If you would like to be one of those 200 please write to &#119;&#105;&#108;lia&#109;.bu&#105;&#115;&#116;&#64;e&#99;&#97;d&#101;&#109;y.&#99;&#111;&#109; with subject line ORS.

We...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="mailto:william.buist@ecademy.com"></a>William Buist (<i>ORC</i>) and James Murphy (<i>OSC</i>) now have 120 completed #ORS questionnaires.<br />
<br />
We must have 200 to validate all the questions.<br />
<br />
If you would like to be one of those 200 please write to william.buist@ecademy.com with subject line ORS.<br />
<br />
We got Hannah, Ross, TJ Power to complete it last night over dinner. <i>Weird they said</i>.<br />
<br />
Thank for your support. Tx<br />
<br />
<i>p.s. Penny came out ORS. Darren came out CSS <img src="http://www.ecademy.com/misc/wink.gif" width="12" height="12" title="wink" alt="wink" align="bottom" /></i>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ors-120-complete-80-to-go-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>El Camino de Santiago &#8211; The Way of St. James or St. James&#8217; Way</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/el-camino-de-santiago-the-way-of-st-james-or-st-james-way/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/el-camino-de-santiago-the-way-of-st-james-or-st-james-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2012 21:51:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=174265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Year	Pilgrims

1985	690
1986	1,801
1987	2,905
1988	3,501
1989	5,760²
1990	4,918
1991	7,274
1992	9,764
1993	99,436
1994	15,863
1995	19,821
1996	23,218
1997	25,179
1998	30,126
1999	154,613
2000	55,004³
2001	61,418
2002	68,952
2003	7...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Year	Pilgrims<br />
<br />
1985	690<br />
1986	1,801<br />
1987	2,905<br />
1988	3,501<br />
1989	5,760²<br />
1990	4,918<br />
1991	7,274<br />
1992	9,764<br />
<u><b>1993	99,436</b></u><br />
1994	15,863<br />
1995	19,821<br />
1996	23,218<br />
1997	25,179<br />
1998	30,126<br />
<u><b>1999	154,613</b></u><br />
2000	55,004³<br />
2001	61,418<br />
2002	68,952<br />
2003	74,614<br />
<u><b>2004	179,944</b></u><br />
2005	93,924<br />
2006	100,377<br />
2007	114,026<br />
2008	125,141<br />
2009	145,877<br />
<u><b>2010	272,703</b></u><br />
2011	179,919<br />
<br />
who's done it, what year do you plan to do it and can you explain the peak years?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/el-camino-de-santiago-the-way-of-st-james-or-st-james-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Ecademy Testimonials</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ecademy-testimonials/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ecademy-testimonials/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2012 17:21:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=174232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Marcus and Julian are putting together a new Ecademy design and require your help with an Ecademy Testimonial to appear on the new site that best describe the value and experience you receive from Ecademy and/or give to Ecademy as this is a community o...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.ecademy.com/account.php?id=604409">Marcus</a> and <a href="http://www.ecademy.com/account.php?id=1">Julian</a> are putting together a new Ecademy design and require your help with an Ecademy Testimonial to appear on the new site that best describe the value and experience you receive from Ecademy and/or give to Ecademy as this is a community of reciprocity from which we all benefit. <br />
<br />
Please write as clearly and concisely as possible as your testimonial will appear on the site with your name below it.<br />
<br />
Thank you in advance for your support and the generosity of your testimonial in explaining this community to others who are not yet members.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/ecademy-testimonials/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is there a radio specialist here?</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/is-there-a-radio-specialist-here/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/is-there-a-radio-specialist-here/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 07:29:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173999</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Friends of mine in the US wish to run 24/7 business radio station. Please email t&#104;omas&#46;&#112;&#111;&#119;&#101;r&#64;ec&#97;d&#101;m&#121;.&#99;om]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Friends of mine in the US wish to run 24/7 business radio station. Please email thomas.power@ecademy.com]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/is-there-a-radio-specialist-here/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Facebook IPO Summary</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/facebook-ipo-summary/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/facebook-ipo-summary/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2012 10:20:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173901</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[http://www.policymic.com/articles/3816/facebook-ipo-summary-of-s-1/latest_articles

Facebook will trade using the ticker "FB"
2011 revenue was $3.7 billion (88% growth from 2010).
2011 net income was $1.0 billion
Currently, Facebook has 845 millio...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<a href="http://www.policymic.com/articles/3816/facebook-ipo-summary-of-s-1/latest_articles" rel="nofollow">http://www.policymic.com/articles/3816/facebook-ipo-summary-of-s-1/latest_articles</a><br />
<br />
<i>Facebook will trade using the ticker "FB"<br />
2011 revenue was $3.7 billion (88% growth from 2010).<br />
2011 net income was $1.0 billion<br />
Currently, Facebook has 845 million monthly active users with 48% logging-in daily.<br />
Mark Zuckerberg owns 28% of Facebook.<br />
<br />
Here are some extra details (updated regularly):<br />
<br />
Advertising accounts for 85% of 2011 revenue<br />
Facebook has 425 monthly active users on mobile<br />
James Breyer, the president of Accel Partners, owns 11% of Facebook<br />
Mark Zuckerberg controls the majority of the board, making Facebook a "controlled company"<br />
Facebook lists its top three competitors as Google, Microsoft, and Twitter<br />
In 2012, Zynga represented 12% of Facebook revenues<br />
Mark Zuckerberg outlines his philosophy at the end of the S-1:<br />
<br />
"At Facebook, we're inspired by technologies that have revolutionized how people spread and consume information. We often talk about inventions like the printing press and the television  by simply making communication more efficient, they led to a complete transformation of many important parts of society. They gave more people a voice. They encouraged progress. They changed the way society was organized. They brought us closer together.<br />
<br />
We hope to improve how people connect to businesses and the economy.<br />
<br />
We hope to change how people relate to their governments and social institutions.<br />
<br />
Simply put: <b>we don't build services to make money; we make money to build better services</b>."</i>]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/02/facebook-ipo-summary/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>So where is Google heading with Plus (+)?</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/so-where-is-google-heading-with-plus/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/so-where-is-google-heading-with-plus/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 18:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173839</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is thinking like a network not an institution. 

A network is open, random, supportive (ORS). 
An institution is closed selective controlling (CSC). 
Paradoxically networks are the new institutions.

The Google opportunity lies in the comb...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Google is thinking like a network not an institution. <br />
<br />
A network is open, random, supportive (ORS). <br />
An institution is closed selective controlling (CSC). <br />
Paradoxically networks are the new institutions.<br />
<br />
The Google opportunity lies in the combination of their existing assets and the opening of the G+ API (GAPI+).<br />
<br />
What is it we seek as users?<br />
<br />
We want to know who at the most active users?<br />
<br />
We want to know activity by:<br />
<br />
time on site <br />
posts<br />
comments<br />
shares<br />
re-shares<br />
+1s<br />
number of hangouts<br />
number of unique participants in hangouts<br />
ripples<br />
most popular circles<br />
all the above by circles<br />
broken down by village, town, city (that's a lot of data to share but want it we do)<br />
<br />
We then want these people ranked. As Paul Adams says in Grouped these are not necessarily the most powerful or influential people but what they are is the people we can all learn from the most or the fastest (or at least should be logically). I dislike the way knowledge is still not freely shared online. The whole planet must walk forward as a union not in informed and ill-informed groups.<br />
<br />
Social Statistics is helpful but not that useful until the API releases. I think they've made a good start.<br />
<br />
<a href="http://www.socialstatistics.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.socialstatistics.com</a><br />
<a href="http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard" rel="nofollow">http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard</a><br />
<a href="http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard/recent/114149296801704936672" rel="nofollow">http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard/recent/114149296801704936672</a><br />
<a href="http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard/history/114149296801704936672" rel="nofollow">http://socialstatistics.com/dashboard/history/114149296801704936672</a><br />
<br />
Having all these stats will start the process of allowing us to conduct network thinking. Stats help you think because they challenge your mind to ask all the questions you don't know the answer to and think you should know before reaching a conclusion.<br />
<br />
All of us must learn to think like a network. In other words think Open, Random, Supportive in everything we do.<br />
<br />
The next thing we need Google to do is start mixing our G+ activity with our searches (now appearing in search plus) and our email (now appearing with circles in our gmail).<br />
<br />
The key thing we are all looking for is close matches: <br />
People who behave like us. <br />
People who are like us.<br />
People who are close by and like the above.<br />
Not because we are perfect, on the contrary, but because our behaviors match.<br />
<br />
When behaviors match with people like us it is likely we have a great deal in common. It is likely we have complementary skills. It is likely we have complementary networks of people. It is likely we can work together, support one another, connect one another. However unique we think we are there are many people like us, the problem is we can't find them and they can't find us. We must solve this. Right now we have to do this pattern matching in our heads despite having a billion servers available to do it for us.<br />
<br />
We need more matches faster.<br />
<br />
Why is people matching so important to the planet?<br />
<br />
There are many resources (people) in the world not finding their rightful home. In other words being where their skills are most desired and in demand. Millions of skilled people worldwide are not in work or not being fully utilized in the work they are doing. This is such a waste of resource, of talent.<br />
<br />
Last night on President Obama's hangout we learned of a semi-conductor engineer who could not find work for three years. <br />
<br />
<iframe width="560" height="315" src="http://www.youtube.com/embed/eeTj5qMGTAI" frameborder="0" allowfullscreen></iframe><br />
<br />
Personally I don't believe that. I believe those who need his skills cannot find him and he cannot find them. To me the internet's holy grail is matching people to demand and demand to people. It is a weakness of data sharing by both matchseekers individual and organization.<br />
<br />
Google+ is the first system I have seen that can deal with this so I want to help make it happen by pushing this debate inside Google and inside this place with all you folks.<br />
<br />
Of course it is a failing on the part of the user who fails to describe their skills, availability and price correctly. The machines need to take over this work if people haven't got the time or skills to do it. Using your searches, your gmail, your G+ there is enough data there for matches to be made by a machine. By G+ or is that G++?<br />
<br />
Next organizations need to be comfortable publishing to the cloud. Right now being CSC organizations are uncomfortable fearing the worst. Only data in the cloud can be matched with data in cloud. If we don't trust the cloud we cannot start. Matches cannot begin and my goal is futile. We must trust the cloud and deal with the errors and exceptions when they arise for they surely will.<br />
<br />
The challenge for families worldwide in a matching based world is going where the work is, where your skills are required. This has been an issue for families for time immemorial. It's going to get worse, or harder or better depending on your point of view. Mobile working populations are critical to wealth creation. People in the USA move house on average every three years. In Europe it's more like seven years. Look at the difference in performance.<br />
<br />
For now it's my belief that G+ could be the perfect matchmaking system and I want to support, coach, nudge, cajole, nag, guide, steer point Google in making it happen for the benefit of all those under utilized skills we have worldwide and for all the new valued added we can bring to organizations once those matches have been made. <br />
<br />
What matches are you seeking from G+ perhaps I can connect you using my good old-fashioned memory?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/so-where-is-google-heading-with-plus/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does Controlling mean to you? #ORS</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-controlling-mean-to-you-ors/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-controlling-mean-to-you-ors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:04:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173824</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.

6 people came out as ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.<br />
<br />
6 people came out as ORS - Open Random Supportive.<br />
<br />
4 people came out as OSS - Open Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as ORC - Open Random Controlling.<br />
<br />
1 person came out as OSC - Open Selective Controlling.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as CSS - Closed Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
So my question to you all is what does Controlling mean to you?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-controlling-mean-to-you-ors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does Selective mean to you? #ORS</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-selective-mean-to-you-ors/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-selective-mean-to-you-ors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:03:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173823</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.

6 people came out as ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.<br />
<br />
6 people came out as ORS - Open Random Supportive.<br />
<br />
4 people came out as OSS - Open Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as ORC - Open Random Controlling.<br />
<br />
1 person came out as OSC - Open Selective Controlling.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as CSS - Closed Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
So my question to you all is what does Selective mean to you?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-selective-mean-to-you-ors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What does Closed mean to you? #ORS</title>
		<link>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-closed-mean-to-you-ors/</link>
		<comments>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-closed-mean-to-you-ors/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Thomas Power</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Community]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ecademy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet Scout]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thomas Power]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.ecademy.com/node.php?id=173822</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.

6 people came out as ...]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Last week we launched the ORS questionnaire developed with Darren Shirlaw. 15 people came along and took the questionnaire. We are testing a further 200 to validate the questionnaire further before launching online to everyone.<br />
<br />
6 people came out as ORS - Open Random Supportive.<br />
<br />
4 people came out as OSS - Open Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as ORC - Open Random Controlling.<br />
<br />
1 person came out as OSC - Open Selective Controlling.<br />
<br />
2 people came out as CSS - Closed Selective Supportive.<br />
<br />
So my question to you all is what does Closed mean to you?]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://thomaspower.org/2012/01/what-does-closed-mean-to-you-ors/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

